New Agentic automation — agents & orchestration · SOX-ready controls (ITGC & ITAC) · solution accelerators →

Flagship capability

Controls-Ready Automation: SOX, ITGC & ITAC

An agent that touches financial reporting is in SOX scope the day it goes live. We engineer automation against IT general controls and build the application controls into the process itself — so it arrives audit-ready instead of becoming a finding.

What we build

  • ITACs by design — input and edit validation, completeness and accuracy checks, automated reconciliations, approval workflows and exception queues built into the automated process, not bolted on after
  • Segregation of duties for agents — the identity that proposes is never the identity that approves; agents run on their own least-privilege service credentials, never a person's login
  • ITGC-aligned delivery — logical access, change management, program development and computer operations are covered by how we build and run, not by a document written afterwards
  • Agents under change control — prompts, model versions, tools and thresholds are versioned configuration: reviewed, tested against a fixed evaluation set, and promoted through environments like any other code
  • Evidence on every run — inputs, sources cited, model and prompt version, tool calls, validations passed, approver and timestamp, retained and exportable for walkthroughs and testing
  • Built on governed agents — the approvals, guardrails and run records come from how we build agentic automation & orchestration, and ship inside every solution accelerator
  • Controls automation — agents and workflows that do the controls work itself: evidence collection, user-access review preparation, change-ticket-to-deployment matching, continuous controls monitoring

How we build it

Control matrix per automationLeast-privilege service identitiesSSO · MFA · key rotation (KMS)Pull-request review gatesEvaluation & regression suitesEnvironment promotion (dev → stage → prod)Run & audit logsApproval queues · kill switchInfrastructure as code (AWS CDK · Terraform)Object-locked backups · disaster recoveryPlaywright · Cypress end-to-end suites

What we engineer against

The four ITGC domains, the application controls inside the process, and the evidence that ties them together.

ITGC · Access

Access to programs & data

Every agent and automation has its own identity, scoped to the systems and actions it needs. SSO and MFA for people, short-lived credentials for workloads, no shared or long-lived keys, access that can be listed and reviewed.

ITGC · Change

Program changes

Nothing reaches production without a reviewed pull request, a passing test and evaluation run, and a traceable deployment. That includes prompt, model and threshold changes — for an agent, those are the program.

ITGC · Development

Program development

Requirements, design, testing and sign-off are part of delivery: a control matrix written with the process owner, test evidence kept, and user acceptance before go-live.

ITGC · Operations

Computer operations

Scheduled and event-driven runs are monitored, failures alert and retry safely, state is idempotent, and backups and recovery are tested — carried over from how we run payments infrastructure.

ITAC

Application controls

Validation, completeness and accuracy checks, reconciliations, tolerances and approvals run inside the workflow. Exceptions route to a person; the agent cannot wave its own output through.

Evidence

An audit trail by default

A run record an auditor can reperform from: what came in, what was decided and by which version, what was checked, who approved. Generated by the system, not assembled by hand in the last week of the quarter.

What we are, and are not. We are automation engineers with SOX controls experience on the team — we design and build automation so that your control owners, internal audit and external auditors can rely on it and test it. We do not issue audit opinions or attestations, and we describe our security practices as PCI-DSS and SOC 2 aligned, not certified.

Proof · Regulated payments

Years of running a platform that lives under audit

SeamlessChex moves real money over ACH and eCheck, so its engineering has always answered to reviewers. We built the partner API with per-application audit logging and separate live and test credentials; isolated the cardholder data environment as its own infrastructure-as-code stack to keep PCI scope contained; run multi-account AWS with SSO, KMS key rotation and object-locked backups; and check every release against end-to-end suites that exercise the payment flows — because in payments a release is judged by whether money still moves, not by unit tests.

Have something that needs to ship?

Tell us what you're building. We'll tell you how we'd build it — and what it'll take.